Friday, October 2, 2026 US Financial & Technology Edition
Market Edition
Updated 13:43 EDT
US Money · Insurance · SaaS
America Pulse Independent Financial & Technology News Wire
New York · Markets
Personal Finance · Investing
Banking · SaaS & Technology
Markets LIVE
Equity S&P 500 $764.37 ▲0.23% Equity Nasdaq $742.99 ▲0.44% Equity Dow $508.21 ▼0.07% Equity Gold $382.71 ▲0.49% Equity WTI Oil $149.55 ▲2.67% Equity Bonds 20Y $77.72 ▼0.08% Crypto BTC $86,721.63 ▲3.60% Crypto ETH $2,749.65 ▲2.15% Crypto XRP $1.54 ▲3.74%
Investing Sep 15, 2026

Waste Of The Day: Alleged Data Center Fraud

Waste Of The Day: Alleged Data Center Fraud Authored by Jeremy Portnoy via RealClearInvestigations, The Securities and Exchange Commission paid $10.7 million to store its electronic data at a Maryland facility that was allegedly certified by a company that does not exist. AiNET Corp. ...

The Securities and Exchange Commission spent $10.7 million to house its electronic records in a Maryland data‑center that later turned out to be backed by a phantom certification. The episode has culminated in a $1.8 million settlement by AiNET Corp. and its former chief executive, Deepak Jain, who are accused of violating the False Claims Act by deliberately misleading the federal agency.

Sec’s Tier‑iii Requirement

In 2012 the SEC launched a search for a new storage site and stipulated that any applicant must hold a Tier III certification, a standard that guarantees continuous operation even while maintenance is underway. AiNET submitted documentation asserting that its facility had earned that certification from an organization called the Uptime Council.

Non‑existent Certifier

Investigators quickly discovered that no entity named Uptime Council exists. The Department of Justice alleges that Jain himself drafted the certification letters and even bought a web domain bearing the council’s name to give the impression of legitimacy. The invented name closely mimics the Uptime Institute, a well‑known firm that actually provides data‑center certifications.

On‑site Obstructions

When SEC staff toured the Maryland site before finalizing the contract, an AiNET employee reportedly barred them from inspecting the hardware and infrastructure that would have revealed the center’s failure to meet Tier III criteria. After the contract was signed, the agency encountered problems with security, cooling and power, prompting additional spending to remediate the shortcomings.

Re‑certification Claims

In 2017 the SEC asked for an updated certification. According to prosecutors, Jain produced another letter from the fictitious Uptime Council claiming a fresh inspection had taken place, even though no such review ever occurred. The agency ceased using the facility in 2018 after the ongoing deficiencies became clear.

Continued Misleading Advertising

Prosecutors further allege that Jain kept promoting the false Tier III certification to private customers through at least 2024, extending the deception beyond the government contract. Jain’s legal team has maintained that AiNET fulfilled its obligations and that no SEC data was lost or compromised, but the settlement—without any admission of guilt—reflects the seriousness of the alleged fraud.

Lessons for Government Procurement

The case underscores the vulnerability of relying on third‑party certifications when the certifying body can be fabricated by the contractor itself. It also highlights the importance of rigorous, independent verification in high‑value government contracts, especially for critical infrastructure such as data storage. The SEC’s experience serves as a cautionary tale for agencies seeking to protect sensitive information while navigating complex vendor landscapes.

Source: zerohedge.com · 2026-09-15

ipt>